Photo: S. Hermann and F. Richter, from Pixabay
Full Definition of crime
1: an illegal act for which someone can be punished by the government especially : a gross violation of law
2: a grave offense especially against morality
3: criminal activity efforts to fight crime
4: something reprehensible, foolish, or disgraceful It's a crime to waste good food.
Tuesday, October 26, 2021, government agency officials committed grave offenses against morality and illegal acts, i.e., Crimes Against Humanity, yet again. A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel called the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), corrupted by Pfizer funds, has voted 17-0 to endorse COVID-19 vaccines for children ages five through 11. In doing so, they have authorized the medical violation of America’s children, on a massive scale.
One of the persons responsible for these crimes, panel member Dr. Ruben, publicly admitted the FDA cannot know how safe the vaccine is “unless you start giving it.” In other words, Dr. Ruben publicly acknowledged the experimental nature of the injections, the inadequacy of the brief and low-powered clinical trials, and the utter lack of long-term safety data, yet he blithely recommend the injections be given: “That’s just the way it goes,” he said.
In claiming the injections must be administered to millions of children before the FDC can finally “learn about how safe this vaccine is,” Dr. Ruben also told a whopper of a lie. The currently available data is more than adequate to signal the negative effects of the genetic injections on humans, including children, yet the regulatory authorities have been willfully choosing to ignore it.
Data analyst, entrepreneur, and humanitarian Steve Kirsch sums up the problem in his article for TrialSiteNews: “Why won’t the CDC or FDA reveal the VAERS URF?”
Summary: The VAERS underreporting factor (URF) is required information to be known for any risk-benefit of assessment of a vaccine. The fact that this number was never calculated by the FDA or CDC means that all the safety recommendations to date have been by guessing. This has resulted in the needless loss of life of well over 150,000 Americans.
VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It is the official system relied upon by the FDA and CDC for adverse event tracking.
For example, if you report an adverse event in V-Safe, the app they told you about when you got vaccinated, you are told to file a VAERS report. It is essentially the mother of all adverse event reporting systems for vaccine events in the US. There is nothing more comprehensive than VAERS.
The most important thing to know about VAERS is that it is always underreported. This is widely known.
To properly interpret any safety data, you must know the underreporting factor (URF).
For example, the famous Lazarus report estimated the VAERS URF to be over 100
. . .
When we do the math, we find that the URF is 41, well in line with the mean and range described in the Baker paper. It means that over 150,000 people have been killed by the vaccine so far (and we show 8 different ways in that paper, only one of which uses VAERS).
The troubling thing is this: nobody at the CDC, FDA, or on any of the outside committees will admit this. When they are asked, “what is the URF for serious events in VAERS for the COVID vaccine” they are unable to respond. Not even Steven A. Anderson of the FDA can answer that. He said he was the top guy for vaccine safety at the FDA. I heard him say that on a zoom call.
He won’t talk. He doesn’t respond to emails, he doesn’t respond to voicemails. His staff doesn’t respond either.
Janet Woodcock won’t tell me the URF.
The friendly people at covid19vaxsafety@cdc.gov won’t tell me the URF.
Lorrie McNeill of the FDA won’t tell me the URF.
Tom Shimabukuro won’t tell me the URF.
John Su won’t tell me the URF. He pretends in his presentations to ACIP and VRBPAC committees that the URF=1 because he never points out that VAERS is underreported or what the reporting factor is. We have all that on the record.
No member of any of the outside committees of the FDA or CDC would respond to my multiple requests.
I have tried to find someone knowledgeable to interview to ask that question, but no prominent pro-vaccine person would consent to an interview. Eric Topol doesn’t respond. Monica Gandhi doesn’t respond. UCSF Dean of Medicine Bob Wachter won’t talk to me on camera. They are all afraid of being exposed.
None of the fact checkers I asked would help me out . . .
https://trialsitenews.com/why-wont-the-cdc-or-fda-reveal-the-vaers-urf/
Here is Steve Kirsch again, writing for his own website:
What my analysis found
My analysis shows that two independent stopping conditions have already been triggered for all three COVID vaccines in the US.
Each stopping condition has been validated in the scientific peer-reviewed literature:
The vaccines have killed > 150,000 Americans
The vaccines kill more people than they save for all age groups
We only need to trigger ONE stopping condition in order to halt vaccination. The inconvenient truth is that BOTH of these conditions have triggered and both of these stopping conditions are now VALIDATED in the peer-reviewed scientific literature (see each article for details). This is an inconvenient truth, so everyone ignores it and refuses to talk about it.
Early treatment is safer and more effective than vaccination. We should use it instead of vaccination. We can get back to normal instantly, eliminate long-haul COVID, and get to herd immunity very quickly.
But nobody will agree to debate us. Even Pfizer declined to defend the safety of their own drug. TrialSiteNews challenged the purveyors of the false narrative to a debate. Nobody responded.
Many other humanitarians, including prominent doctors and scientists, have reached out to the FDA panel, among them Dr. Josh Guetzkow, of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In “FDA Panel Endorses Pfizer Shots for 5- to 11-Year-Olds,” Megan Redshaw of The Defender reports:
Guetzkow said there is no emergency for children, especially healthy ones whose risk of severe illness and death is “almost nil.”
Guetzkow said kids with pre-existing conditions and prior COVID infections were not included in Pfizer’s study, so including them in the EUA is negligence.
“Pfizer’s trial is woefully underpowered to detect specific safety concerns, such as myocarditis, just like the adolescent study was, and if they weren’t able to detect an unexpected safety concern there, they wouldn’t be able to here,” Guetzkow said.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-endorses-pfizer-covid-vaccine-children
Statistician and Finance Specialist Mathew Crawford, author of Rounding the Earth Newsletter, explains in “The Efficacy Illusions, Part I: The Naming Illusion” how vaccine studies can be manipulated to achieve desired outcomes:
The First Magic Trick: Naming the Disease
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet." -Juliet (Shakespeare)
If you're not too offended to read a medical dictionary, you might note that a disease is an expression of symptoms, regardless of etiology or pathology. . .
As a result of this first magic trick, the several million people suffering vaccine-induced serious adverse events are not counted as COVID-19 cases, nor are deaths caused by the vaccines appropriately categorized. Any efficacy computations or risk-benefit analysis that fails to take this into account are gross statistical misrepresentations of reality.
Crawford’s “The Efficacy Illusions, Part II: Engineering Interpretations of Data" delves further:
The Second Magic Trick: Excluding Inconvenient Data
Has anyone else ever wondered how conveniently and crisply the efficacy rates of the two mRNA vaccines matched so well? We see dose dependence in associated adverse events, but not in disease prevention? Why would we even keep both vaccines on the market, then, when we could just use the one with lower AE rates? Something seems fishy in the logic...
In “Ten red flags in the FDA's risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer's EUA application to inject American children 5 to 11 with its mRNA product,” author of uTobian and data analyst Toby Rogers sums up the situation succinctly, without pulling punches:
The Pfizer vaccine fails any honest risk-benefit assessment in connection with its use in children ages 5 to 11. The FDA’s risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine in children ages 5 to 11 is shoddy. It used tortured logic (that would be rejected by any proper academic journal) in order to reach a predetermined result that is not based in science. The FDA briefing document is a work of fiction and it must be withdrawn immediately. If the FDA continues with this grotesque charade it will cause irreparable harms to children and the FDA leadership will one day be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
In “Excess Deaths During Pandemic Include Collateral Deaths,” published in TrialSiteNews, Dr. Joel Hirschhorn addresses the problems of misreporting and under-reporting of vaccine deaths and of collateral damages caused not by the virus itself but by excessive and irrational responses of government entities, and by their refusal to admit errors and attempt to correct them. He writes:
The September 2021 study “Government’s Own Data Reveals that at Least 150,000 Probably DEAD in the U.S. Following COVID-19 Vaccines.” by Jessica Rose and Mathew Crawford is the most detailed and impressive effort to determine vaccine deaths. [Author’s Note: Here is Mathew Crawford discussing this.]
This is the summary of its findings: “Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.” This is close to the high end of the range given above.
The study is both long and complex. Here are some highlights.
On the problem of underreporting of vaccine deaths: “In our informal physician surveys we saw a bias to under-report serious adverse events in order to make the vaccines look as safe as possible to the American public since most physicians believe they are hurting society if they do anything to create vaccine hesitancy. Secondly, we’d estimate that at least 95% of physicians have completely bought into the “safe and effective” narrative, and thus any event that they observe they deem as simply anecdotal and don’t bother to report it since it couldn’t have been caused by such a safe vaccine that appeared to do so well in the Phase 3 trials.”
. . .
Public health officials failed to promote early wide use of generics and foolishly pushed mass vaccination that has not proven effective. The former could have prevented over 600,000 infection deaths.
Perhaps the greatest tragedy is that public health officials have stubbornly refused to admit their mistakes.
The government has made no attempt to systematically account for the non-infection indirect collateral pandemic deaths. And surely more and more Americans are dying from the onerous pandemic controls – now emphasizing vaccine mandates – that are destroying and disrupting the lives of millions of people. Especially in view of the above estimates for vaccine deaths.
https://trialsitenews.com/excess-deaths-during-pandemic-include-vaccine-and-collateral-deaths/
Here’s Steve Kirsch again, yesterday: “For the public record: Critical questions FDA must address about vaccine safety.”
On October 26, I was invited by the FDA to give a 3-minute slide presentation during the Open Public Hearing session at the meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) which is the outside committee of the FDA that reviews vaccine safety and efficacy.
Today’s meeting is focused on whether or not to extend the EUA of the Pfizer vaccines for children aged 5 to 11.
Since I was only given 3 minutes of talk time, I prepared just 30 slides at the meeting. All the slides were questions that I believed needed to be fully answered before any vote to authorize vaccination for 5 to 11 year olds. After all, once you’ve been vaccinated, you can never be unvaccinated.
Since I had prepared over 100 questions for the committee, I thought it would be useful for both the VRBPAC committee, as well as the public, to post my slides publicly.
All of the individuals referenced above have volunteered many hours of their energy and time to provide citizens and regulators with solid data analysis regarding the safety of the experimental injection products. They have sent question after question, warning after warning. Yet, obviously-corrupt officials continue pushing these pharmaceutical products upon citizens and now children.
Thus far, no political representatives, no law enforcement agents, no courts, no entities of sufficient power of any nature have been willing to intervene sufficiently to stop this Juggernaut.
Now, therefore, it is up to caring nurses, physicians, parents and others to non-violently refuse to permit children to become lab rats or guinea pigs for Pfizer or any other pharmaceutical company. It is up to citizens to warn their neighbors. It is up to parents to warn their children. It is up to grandparents to try to protect their grandchildren by sharing the truth.
Keep in mind, for-profit pharmaceutical corporations have been exempted from legal liability for the harms caused by their products. They have been heavily subsidized by the Pentagon and by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as by Congressional appropriations. Moreover, they work in concert with a deeply corrupted World Health Organization. To gain a thorough understanding of how this works, visit The Highwire.
I shall leave you with this, perhaps the most damning evidence of all:
“Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?”
Abstract
This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.
A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic (emphasis added). The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X#bib0110